The History and Discovery of CMO
(excerpt from: The 30 Day Arthritis Cure,
page 38-45)
The
cure for arthritis - you’d think we were after the Holy Grail or something.
It seemed so incredibly difficult and elusive. After all, medical science
has been searching for it for centuries with nothing more to show than a few
pain relievers and anti-inflammatory drugs. Nothing before even came close
to being a cure.
Medical professionals loathe using the word miracle even in
the face of the most miraculous of circumstances. Nevertheless, the word
keeps cropping up in physicians’ reports about CMO. Dr. William C. Douglas
titled his article A New “Miracle Cure” for Arthritis in the newsletter
Second Opinion. Dr. Douglas Hunt used the word in his book Boom
You’re Well. And patients call it miraculous all the time. Even medical
doctors who’ve sought relief from their own pain and suffering through
various other remedies have used the expression liberally.
It’s no wonder, for there have been virtually no truly significant advances
in the treatment of arthritis since the times when people were chewing on
willow tree bark to suck out its aspirin, or later the synthesis of aspirin
by the German chemist Felix Hoffman in 1893. Medical science has made
virtually no progress in the treatment of arthritis in over a hundred years.
Painkillers and anti-inflammatory drugs are all we’ve had, and those just
try to help relieve the symptoms. There’s been absolutely nothing to
treat the cause of arthritis. That is, not until now.
A revolutionary discovery - buried
since early 1970’s
Back in the early 1970s a researcher in the employ of the U.S.
Government National Institutes of Health (NIH) made a discovery. In a
certain strain of laboratory rats he found a substance that not only made
animals immune to getting arthritis, but also cured afflicted animals. The
substance, originally extracted from ground up Swiss Albino Mice, is called
cetylmyristoleate.
However, when the researcher reported his remarkable
findings to his superiors in an attempt to secure funding for additional
research, his request was mysteriously denied. Nevertheless, struggling
along without authorization, he continued his studies and reported further
successes. Strangely, not only were his requests for funding continuously
denied, all of his accomplishments went completely unrecognized. Though they
never said so directly, it was as though the NIH wanted him to abandon the
project completely. Discouraged though he was, he still continued his
research as best he could with absolutely no funding at all. When he retired
about a decade later, since even the mere existence of his work went
completely unacknowledged by the NIH, he took his discovery with him and
continued the research on his own. And well he deserved to do so. Had he
not, his discovery may never have come to light.
It has been reported that some time later, one by one he
went to three different major pharmaceutical companies offering to share his
discovery. One by one, his offers were rejected - not for lack of
effectiveness, but because the product was derived from natural sources it
could not be patented in a way to exclusively retain all the profits. The
companies couldn’t care less about the fact that it worked, only that they
couldn’t protect it from being manufactured by some competing company. Nor
did they express any interest in funding further research on the project.
One could also speculate on the likelihood that by making
available a product that potentially reverses the arthritic process
permanently, it would kill their annual multi-billion dollar sales of
existing arthritis products - all of which must be taken repeatedly for the
rest of the arthritis victims’ lives. Quite understandably, of course, the
pharmaceutical companies love products that lead to a lifetime of repeat
sales. After its rejection by the pharmaceutical companies the project lay
fallow for several years. No further attempts were made to explore its
potential.
The chain of events that followed has never been made
crystal clear. It has been reported that as some years passed, the
researcher himself began to suffer terribly from arthritis and was receiving
conventional medical therapy to treat it. It is important to note that
despite the fact that he had explored the safety and effectiveness of his
discovery on lower animals at the NIH, research had never reached the level
of testing on higher animals. But once his arthritis reached
excruciating extremes and his physician told him that he was beyond any
effective help, the researcher decided to take a risk. He brewed up a batch
of cetylmyristoleate at home and injected himself. Thus, he became the first
person ever to receive the substance as a test of the discovery on human
beings. We honor his courage.
It was a historic moment. He began to feel symptomatic
relief the very next day, and soon he reached a point where he experienced
total reversal of his arthritis. His doctor was astonished when he
subsequently examined his patient and heard the whole story of the
discovery.
The doctor was so impressed that he persuaded him to write
an account of his research project. The doctor promised to help him get it
published in the Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, hoping that the article
might stimulate someone into continuing the exploration of the project.
Then, early in 1995, a few months after the article appeared, that’s exactly
what happened. The San Diego Clinic embarked on a project to develop the
discovery into a usable product.
But long before that, it seems that several years had
intervened between the self-injection and the actual publication of the
article. Meanwhile, it has been reported, even though the substance was
provided quite informally to a couple hundred more arthritis victims with
astounding success, there was no formal progress in research or development.
The journal article itself didn’t seem to stimulate much
interest either. Perhaps that’s because it was only three pages long and
dealt solely with mouse model studies. Besides, it was reporting on research
that took place over twenty years before. Perhaps the readers thought there
couldn’t be much value to something that had lain dormant so very long. Or
maybe they thought there must have been more recent research that refuted
the early findings. Nor did the article provoke questions about why it had
been ignored by the NIH and how it came to be buried for so long - except in
one instance.
It’s not easy turning a discovery
into a miracle
When a research associate of the San Diego Clinic found the
report, he immediately recognized its potential. Intense research on
arthritis by that group had been ongoing for several years, spurred on in
part by the personal interest of the clinic’s director who himself was
suffering from very severe osteoarthritis in both knees.
It wouldn’t take long to produce a small quantity for some
preliminary testing, but there were drawbacks. The original substance was
effective as an injectable, but to make it readily available to the public,
an oral form would have to be developed. As an orally administered product
the original injectable form often produced diarrhea or upset the stomach.
It was heavy oil that resulted a gooey mess when put into capsules.
Furthermore, not only was it difficult to digest, its bioavailability was
very low. Low bioavailability results in very little of a product actually
being assimilated in a form that’s effective for its purpose in the body.
That means more product is needed to accomplish its mission. And that drives
up the cost, which was already very high as a result of the complexity in
producing the substance.
Once the decision was made to try to develop an improved
product, the original researcher was approached with an offer to join in the
forthcoming project. For reasons not clearly expressed, he refused. Perhaps,
as a result of the previous rejections, he felt there was no commercial
value to the substance. Or he may have had other considerations. Whatever
the reason, he rejected the offer.
What the new researchers were after would have to be quite
different from the original, yet retain or improve on its effectiveness.
Thanks to the genius of the biochemist that found the journal article, all
of their goals were met. He was able to develop a product with high
bioavailability when taken orally. Furthermore, it did not upset the
stomach. Nor did it disturb the intestinal tract, except in the most
sensitive persons. And he managed to overcome one of the biggest hurdles:
come up with a manufacturing process that was cost-effective. It was an
amazing feat.
Finally, a product for the public
The result was cerasomal-cis-9-cetylmyristoleate, which bears the
commercial name of CMO. Now CMO is quite different from the unmodified
cetylmyristoleate which produces nausea, is so hard to digest, and has such
a low level of bioavailability. In CMO, the cetylmyristoleate is
phase stabilized using certain cerasomal technologies which makes it so much
easier to assimilate through the intestine, disposes of the nausea problem,
and gives it enormously higher levels of bioavailability. It also results in
an end product that is a waxy solid rather than a messy oily liquid, making
it much easier and neater to capsule. The end result was the commercially
viable product available today: CMO. And that’s the product so many people
are calling a miracle because it has been so effective where all else has
failed.
There are cases where people had been unable to walk up a
flight of stairs for years, but they’re doing it now - and painlessly,
thanks to CMO. There are numerous cases where conventional treatments had
reached a point where they were no longer of any benefit at all - yet CMO
relieved all their symptoms. Many were very severe cases. Actually, there
have been so many successes with extreme cases that they’re not at all
uncommon any more. Doctors keep reporting new ones every week. The specific
details of many cases, some quite ordinary and some quite fascinating, will
be reported in following chapters.
A warning about counterfeit CMO!
CMO has been so effective that there are even several counterfeit
versions being produced by unscrupulous criminals preying upon unsuspecting
arthritis victims and health product dealers. Their labels may even claim to
be the original or authentic product, but they are not CMO. One of the
following chapters describes most of these counterfeit products and explains
how to verify your product source.
A Federal Court in California has sent a clear message that
it recognizes the authenticity of CMO and will not tolerate the infringement
of counterfeiters upon the authentic product. The United States District
Court in Orange, California awarded a half million dollars in damages in a
judgment against Advanced Labs of Redding, California as a result of a suit
filed against them alleging trademark infringement, false advertising, and
unfair competition, claiming that those practices resulted in consumer
confusion and loss of sales of authentic CMO products.
The CMO mark has been used since November 1995 to clearly
and specifically identify the proprietary cerasomal-cis-9- cetylmyristoleate
product. CMO is a natural immunomodulator used by people suffering from such
ailments as arthritis, Crohn’s disease, carpal tunnel syndrome, fibromyalgia,
emphysema, migraine headaches, prostate inflammation, and several other
ailments with autoimmune involvement.
Still, those phony products keep cropping up. Remember, it’s
buyer beware. If you have any doubts and want to verify a CMO product,
you’re welcome to visit www.realcmo.com for confirmation of its
authenticity. |